You are here: Home Knowledge Base Innovation, Dynamism and Entrepreneurship Proposals Silicon Valley or Demand Mountain?
Symposium 2013

Proposal - Silicon Valley or Demand Mountain?

The Challenge

Innovation as the foundation of economic dynamism and prosperity is a complex process involving contributions from various players. In particular it deals with the transformation of basic science into ...

Innovation as the foundation of economic dynamism and prosperity is a complex process involving contributions from various players. In particular it deals with the transformation of basic science into rival proposals that improve the well-being of mankind. For more than 200 years technological innovation has driven economic development. All growth is based on innovation. The process of innovation involves complementary contributions from science, from entrepreneurs, from the financial markets, from the investment community and from government.

BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON – Everyone wants to know how to build the next Silicon Valley: an innovation hub that draws talent and capital, and that creates jobs, companies, and whole new industries. Governments of developed countries scramble to subsidize technology that could be the Next Big Thing. Policymakers in emerging economies hope that incentives like tax breaks and free land will induce innovators to settle and prosper there. But most of these well-meaning schemes are missing an essential ingredient: demand.

Demand for innovation in specific areas of technology has been the common force behind all high-tech hot spots, as well as the most important inventions. Technological breakthroughs such as antibiotics and cars responded to a compelling need felt by a huge populace of consumers. Government projects such as the United States’ Apollo program – intended to put a man on the moon – drove demand for more basic technologies (which are simply inventions that no one has asked for yet).

Silicon Valley itself was built on demand. The US Department of Defense put up tens of billions of dollars in contracts for microelectronics, a commitment that both paid down innovators’ risk and created an infrastructure that would support the growth of start-ups.

All demand is not created equal, though, and it is instructive to examine the differences.

Consumer or market-driven demand – the kind most of us think of when we hear the word – is far less predictable, and therefore much riskier, than state-sponsored demand of the sort that landed a man on the moon. Companies that depend solely on their products’ commercial appeal are limited in the kinds of innovations that they can safely introduce, because if one of their products fails in the marketplace, they may not survive to build another one. This is especially true of start-ups and small companies – the very players that everyone hopes will show up in their next-wave Silicon Valleys.

Fortunately, by sponsoring long-term, targeted initiatives, governments can stimulate more predictable demand. The Apollo program gave innovators clearly defined goals and a roadmap for getting there: first put animals in orbit, then put people there, then send probes to the moon, then send people there.

Equally important, the government offered rewards for interim progress, not just ultimate success. Putting a monkey in space may not have been the most exciting achievement, but the government was paying for it, so it happened. A smart government creates guaranteed demand not only for the solution itself, but for the steps along the way.

Coupling intermediate technical milestones with guaranteed incentives enables companies to focus on problems that might take ten years or more to solve. It also motivates innovators from a variety of industries to take on complex problems that must be addressed by more than one kind of invention. The US Defense Department’s microelectronics initiative required not only new materials and circuits, but also new methods of fabrication. Because of the reward structure, these efforts could be coordinated, rather than stumbling along in isolation.

Unlike market-driven demand, which too often results in a winner-takes-all dynamic, statesponsored demand creates an environment in which multiple solutions to technical problems can proliferate and coexist. The pioneers of microelectronics tried many strategies to supplant vacuum tubes, and they delivered a host of semiconductors and chip designs: germanium, silicon, aluminum, gallium arsenide, PNP, NPN, CMOS, and so on. Some of these research efforts were never implemented, but many found their way into specialized devices. The diversity of options allowed widespread adoption, paving the way for the digital revolution.

As with the microelectronics program, government incentives don’t have to line the road all the way to commercial success. At some point, companies will be ready to sell products, and market demand can take over. The US defense department was the only customer for integrated circuits in 1962, but by the end of the decade consumers were buying transistor radios and pocket calculators in droves.

Likewise, state-sponsored demand should not take the form of subsidies to specific technologies or companies; the government has no business gambling taxpayer money on particular ventures. Assuming that risk is the job of venture capitalists and others in finance, not public officials. But there is little risk in offering a contract for a job well done: there is no payout if the problem remains unsolved.

And those payouts are modest compared to the research and development efforts they stimulate. A program offering rewards of $1-5 billion in contracts or deployment commitments can generate many times that value in private-sector R&D. Innovators and their investors are willing to bet big on these opportunities, because they know that the eventual reward in revenue from a global customer base will far exceed the initial incentive. That makes state-sponsored demand a very efficient mechanism for generating innovation.

Because of the multiplier effect, small governments and states, and even large cities, can successfully sponsor the kind of demand that fosters a world-class innovation epicenter. Certain Scandinavian countries, Chinese provinces, and the city-state of Singapore, for example, are ideally positioned to try this approach.

Some years ago, I calculated how many units of product need to be sold to launch a technology. The number is actually quite modest: If you can move between 100,000 and one million units of a disruptive product, you can establish the technology standards for that category and in time become the global leader of a new industry. Government sponsorship ensures that a certain number of people will adopt your product. At the start, it need not be that many.

The economic planners and policymakers who are chasing Silicon Valley’s taillights are learning that they cannot always replicate the entrepreneurial culture and finance mechanisms that flourish there now. But they have forgotten how it all started: guaranteed demand, which stimulates the most ambitious kind of innovation.

The lesson is a simple one: Don’t try to build another Silicon Valley. Instead, build a Demand Mountain, and the innovators will come.

    Related Proposals

    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Something for Everyone: Building Incentives for Innovation Ecosystems

    Healthy innovation economies are the main driver of prosperity in the 21st century. But the three players that have traditionally sponsored basic research and invention in those economies are no longe ...

    Healthy innovation economies are the main driver of prosperity in the 21st century. But the three players that have traditionally sponsored basic research and invention in those economies are no longer willing or able to perform that role. Corporate R&D has become increasingly conservative as concerns for profit push incremental, rather than radical, innovation. Governments are de-prioritizing funding for basic, blue-sky research. The days of massive, government-sponsored science and technology projects, such as the Apollo program or the military microelectronics investment that spurred Silicon Valley, are well behind us. Even venture capital, the favorite alternative for financing disruptive technologies, is

    Polity, Business
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Creating global support networks for young innovators and entrepreneurs

    In order to support young entrepreneurs and innovators worldwide, we need to foster a multi-tiered ecosystem in which: Tier 1: the general public is educated and inspired about technology and entrepre ...

    In order to support young entrepreneurs and innovators worldwide, we need to foster a multi-tiered ecosystem in which: Tier 1: the general public is educated and inspired about technology and entrepreneurship (both theoretically and with practical, applicable 'hard skills' in programming, digital design, digital marketing etc as opposed to the emphasis on traditional 'soft skills' such as management theory etc). This needs to happen on elementary and secondary school levels, in addition to this being continued and integrated in traditional higher education models.   Tier 2: (young) innovators are supported in the protection of their intellectual property (foster, don't exploit).

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Peace through Entrepreneurship - An idea to foster peace through entrepreneurship?

    Use Innovation, Dynamism and Entrepreneurship to foster peace and economic growth at the same time. “Almost always great new ideas don't emerge from within a single person or function, but at the in ...

    Use Innovation, Dynamism and Entrepreneurship to foster peace and economic growth at the same time. “Almost always great new ideas don't emerge from within a single person or function, but at the intersection of functions or people that have never met before. And most universities are organized so you don't have those intersections. They are siloed. Universities think people come up with great ideas by closing the door”. (Clayton Christensen - HBS) Politicians think in the same way and are just as siloed; so are entrepreneurs and social leaders. All of them are siloed: academics, politicians, economists and social leaders.

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Innovation Officers (IO)

    The quest to find the right key to create Innovation has long been a subject to much speculation, academic research and theoretic models. Under our very eyes innovative companies like IDEO from Califo ...

    The quest to find the right key to create Innovation has long been a subject to much speculation, academic research and theoretic models. Under our very eyes innovative companies like IDEO from California, USA and SAP from Germany have developed extremely efficient and sound behavior models on innovation creating a hands on innovation process that any company can use anywhere. This is a real step forward in the understanding of innovation as even Dr. Robert G. Cooper, the creator of the well known Stage-Gate®-Process and one of the leading voices when it comes to innovation, proclaimed that new innovation approaches

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Putting Money Back In Its Place

    For 100 years the world has been on a fairly consistent march towards more and more free enterprise, and deeper and more sharp edged caverns of capitalism.  And for approximately 80 of those ye ...

    For 100 years the world has been on a fairly consistent march towards more and more free enterprise, and deeper and more sharp edged caverns of capitalism.  And for approximately 80 of those years the world was not on a bad path.  People (entrepreneurs) created things of real value to other people, and society too, and in the process of us paying for them, productive new industries were stood up (think of the automobile industry, the wired and wireless telephone industries, etc), people were hired, and a middle class was born. And on the backend of this, the entrepreneurs themselves often got rich, enjoyed fame and lived what most would call an exceedingly

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Hedging against Ignorance

    Investment in science and technology at the frontier of knowledge necessarily requires acceptance of fundamental ignorance about future economic and social value; is it possible to hedge this inescapa ...

    Investment in science and technology at the frontier of knowledge necessarily requires acceptance of fundamental ignorance about future economic and social value; is it possible to hedge this inescapable ignorance? Forty years of practice as a venture capitalist operating at the intersection of technological innovation, commercial promise and financial speculation inform these remarks. Early in my career I learned how right Keynes was when he wrote in The General Theory: By “uncertain’ knowledge” . . . I do not mean merely to distinguish what is known from what is merely probable . . . The sense in which I am

    Polity, Business
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Innovation, Dynamism and Entrepreneurship

    The passage Malaysia had to endure has been full of challenges. Due to Malaysia’s strategic sea-lane position, it had been the center of trade and power struggle between the East and West for more t ...

    The passage Malaysia had to endure has been full of challenges. Due to Malaysia’s strategic sea-lane position, it had been the center of trade and power struggle between the East and West for more than 400 years. The Portuguese were the first European colonial powers to establish themselves in Malaya, colonizing Malacca in 1511; followed by the Dutch (1641) and the British (1824). The Japanese occupation during World War II (1941-45) ended British domination in Malaya. In September 1945, after the Japanese surrendered, the British returned to Malaya under the British Military Administration (BMA) and formed Rural Industrial Development Authority

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Youth Entrepreneurship as a Mechanism to Avoid a Lost Generation and Drive Innovation

    Problem The recent economic crisis, the worst since the Great Depression in the 1930s, has led to a disproportionate increase in youth unemployment in both the developed as well as the developing worl ...

    Problem The recent economic crisis, the worst since the Great Depression in the 1930s, has led to a disproportionate increase in youth unemployment in both the developed as well as the developing world. As developing countries account for almost 90% of the world’s youth, this shocking situation largely affects the poorest of the poor countries. However, as we have witnessed over the past 4 years, youth unemployment is a truly global problem. In Europe, for example, the youth unemployment rates increased by 60% over the past 4 years (ILO, 2012), leaving every 4th employable young person without a job. Across

    Polity, Business, Civil Society
    Proposal
    Symposium 2013

    Redefining success: 2020 the perfect vision – human to human

    When looking at the today’s world we see many organizations flourishing and many organizations failing. GDIC is focusing on solution based approaches to provide to any management team globally. The ...

    When looking at the today’s world we see many organizations flourishing and many organizations failing. GDIC is focusing on solution based approaches to provide to any management team globally. The main focus should be on human to human cooperation and collaboration which we can successfully implement while looking at components and elements of global talent management within merger & acquisitions (M&A) and an effective development of the global workforce. These are all very big words. We can break them down in different components so they don’t seem so overwhelming. It is always easier to look at smaller steps so we

    Polity, Academia, Business, Civil Society