Personal tools
>> GES 2008-09 >> GES 2009 >> Themes and Sessions >> The Global Polity >> Repairing Failed States  
07.09.2010
Document Actions

Repairing Failed States

The Challenges

In a number of territories primarily situated in the poorer parts of the world, the state no longer performs its basic security and development functions. Beyond causing hardship for their own citizens, failed states provide breeding grounds of organized crime and terrorism.

Repairing Failed States_170.jpg

The “failed states list” of 2008 of the Fund for Peace and Foreign Policy is topped by Somalia, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Chad, and Iraq (in this order). These states have failed for different reasons, for example a foreign intervention in Iraq or the presence of a stationary bandit in Zimbabwe, but there are often similarities in the mechanisms that lead to state failure, for example the availability of natural resources.

 

State failure causes massive movements of refugees and internally displaced peoples, severe economic decline, and the spread of violence and crime. 9/11 has made the world realize that the effects of state failures do not stop at national borders. (Re-) Establishing state authority in these territories is one of the most challenging tasks of our time. In particular in light of the experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan, pessimism is dominating today’s discourse. This pessimism should be motivation for searching for innovative approaches to state-building in such difficult circumstances. “Repairing failed states” requires solutions that are ultimately driven by the citizens of the respective country. Yet, the global community – governments, international organizations and multinational corporations – can (and sometimes must) assist the citizens in getting into the driver’s seat. From this perspective, this session discusses the following questions:

  1. How to transform disenfranchised populations into stakeholders of a process of state-building? Which are specific mechanisms to reach different groups of these internal stakeholders (political elites, business elites, “ordinary citizens”)?
  2. What is the role of external stakeholders? Do we need a new approach to “development aid”, as its current mode of delivery in weak states hampers state-building? How to improve the interplay between military interventions, humanitarian relief, and development assistance? What is the role of international business in state-building processes? Do we need special supervisory mechanisms for international investors in weak states, such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.
  3. Can we identify general lessons to be learnt from successes and failures of fixing failed states, for example from Iraq, Afghanistan or former Yugoslavia? Where to put priorities in re-establishing state-functions and how to sequence interventions and policies (security, infrastructure, basic service delivery)? Or are these situations too country-specific for any generalizations?

 

Proposed Solutions

Log in


Forgot your password?
Organizers
Kiel_institute

ministry_science.png


zbw

Principal Sponsors

fielmann

Wintershall_en

Alliance Partners


Audi

 

Heinz Nixdorf Stiftung

Strategic Partners


HK Hamburg

 

IHK SH

Senior Partners

DHL 

Supporters


 von Bohlen und Halbach-Stiftung

 
RBS_Group

 

sueverkruep_ahrendt

Knowledge Partners

 
FGV

 

IDF Logo

 

OECD iLibrary

 

oecd

 

Oxford Analytica

Associated Partners

Fachschaft WiSo

 

Hinrichs 

 

Heinrich Knievel

 

 Log Power

 

 promostudio

 

Siemens

 

VKP